• Konstantun Pokotylo
Keywords: categorical imperative, leadership in education, maxim, law, dignity


Categorical imperative in practical philosophy of Immanuel Kant appears as a fundamental principle of ethic and guidelines for human behavior in the sense of whether the maxim, that derived from them, act as a universal law and acquire the significance of expert opinion as to value of the man through the opposition: the man-target or the man-instrumentality to achieving the goal by someone else. This concept was first used by nationalist in the «First principle to the metaphysics’ morals» and developed in the «Critique of Practical Reason». In understanding of the ethical foundations of leadership in education, categorical imperative acts as a central concept. This provides for the scientific discourse from this subject, contemporary and applied nature.

The main ethical principles that could provide a solid moral foundation for successful and long-term leadership is the constant verification of actions, in accordance with the basic requirements that arising from the categorical imperative, namely the requirements, as maxim, that derived from an individual act, and can become as the universal law. Leader must act, guided by mind, and that is what makes his acts as unique and free, on the one hand, and moral and responsible on the other. He must always treat to other people and to himself as to the purpose and never as to the means. High human dignity – the main personal achievement of real leader and a categorical imperative, that formulated by Immanuel Kant in his time, continues to be an important pointer in development of leadership qualities.


Download data is not yet available.


1. Drosdek A. Die wichtigsten Philosophen für Manager. – Frankfurt/New York, 2005.
2. Kant Immanuel – ein Leben – «Habe Mut dich deines eigenen Verstandes zu bedienen!» [Електронний ресурс]. – Режим доступу: kant-ein-leben-habe-mut-dich-deines-eigenen-verstandes-zu
3. Kant, Ausgabe der Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Berlin 1900ff, AA IV, 421 / GMS, BA 52.
4. Kant, Ausgabe der Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Berlin 1900ff, AA IV, 421 / GMS, BA 52.
5. Kant, Ausgabe der Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Berlin 1900ff, AA V, 30 / KpV, A 54 (§ 7 Grundgesetz der reinen praktischen Vernunft).
6. Kant Immanuel: Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten.
Hrsg., eingel. und erl. von Jens Timmermann. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen 2004.
7. Kant Immanuel: Kritik der reinen Vernunft (KrV B75, A48).
8. Єрмоленко А. М. Комунікативна практична філософія. Підручник. – К. : Лібра, 1999. – 488 с.
9. Кант І. Відповідь на питання: що таке просвітництво? // Мислителі німецького романтизму. – Івано-Франківськ, 2003.
10. Кант І. Критика практичного розуму. – К. : Юніверс, 2004. – 240 с.
11. Кант І. Критика чистого розуму. – К. : Юніверс, 2000. – 504 с.
12. Лой А. М. Моральність як чинник цивілізованості та культури: концепція І. Канта // Філософська думка. – Київ, 2004. –
№ 5 – С. 114–134.
13. Шинкарук В. І. Теорія пізнання, логіка і діалектика І. Канта (І. Кант як родоначальник німецької класичної філософії). – К. : Наукова думка, 1973. – 278 с.

Abstract views: 367
PDF Downloads: 194
How to Cite
Pokotylo, K. (2015). CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE AND LEADERSHIP IN EDUCATION. International Scientific Journal of Universities and Leadership, (1), 44-47. Retrieved from