Research integrity support in the system of university governance: experience of the UK

  • Iryna Drach
Keywords: university governance, research governance, research integrity, experience of the UK


In the process of modernizing the national higher education, the emphasis on the need to form a culture of academic integrity in the university environment has become one of the key trends, as evidenced by the provisions of the Law of Ukraine "On Higher Education" (2014), the Law of Ukraine "On Education" (2017, ), The Law of Ukraine "On Scientific and Scientific-Technical Activity" (2016) and other documents. The formation of a culture of research integrity in the university environment is intended to overcome the crisis of academic integrity, which is observed today in Ukraine and is caused by many factors. An analysis of the experience of the UK as one of the world-leading leaders of higher education in support of research integrity in the system of university governance is relevant to determine the guidelines in the process of forming a culture of research integrity. The purpose of the article is to identify positive experience in providing research integrity in the university environment for its possible implementation in the system of higher education of Ukraine. To achieve this goal, the methods of analysis, synthesis, comparison, systematization of scientific and Internet sources were used, which allowed to identify the peculiarities of supporting research integrity in the system of research management in the universities of Great Britain. The application of the generalization method made it possible to draw conclusions about the results of the study. The article substantiates the relevance of the analysis of experience in support of research integrity in the system of university governance of one of the world-leading leaders of higher education - Great Britain. The experience of maintaining high ethical standards in studies in the UK at the national and institutional levels has been analyzed. The main provisions of the key documents developed by the British Research Aid Office, which can be used to develop policies and procedures at Ukrainian universities, are described. Summarizing the information provided by leading UK universities to provide research integrity at the institutional level, it has made it possible to distinguish the following features: the existence of clear, open policies and procedures for ensuring research integrity, their continuous improvement; transparency and accountability of procedures for adhering to the principles of integrity in research; creation of opportunities in the university environment for training and professional development of researchers on the issue of research integrity; University collaboration with partner institutions both at the national and international levels.


Download data is not yet available.


Academachna chesnist jak osnova stalogo rozvutky universutety [Academic honesty as a basis for the sustainable development of the university] (2016). Otrimano z _Univers.pdf (in Ukrainian).

Artjomov, P., & Pak, І. (2016). Academachna nechesnist Jak element academachnoi kulturu ukrainskogo studenstva: resultatu empiruchnuh doslidgen [Academic dishonesty as an element of the academic culture of Ukrainian students: results of empirical research]. Otrimano z (in Ukrainian).

Galata, S. (2015). Academachne shahrajstvo. Otrimano z (in Ukrainian).

Gapon, N. (2014). Stavlennja studentiv do vujaviv academachnoi nechesnosti: kros-kulturnuj analiz [Students' Attitudes toward Academic Dishonesty: A Cross-Cultural Analysis]. Otrimano z (in Ukrainian).

Drach, І. (2018a). Dosvid upravliinnja doslidnickoyu dijalnistyu v universutetah Velukoi Brutanii: filosofsko-аnalitucnuj pidhid [Experience of Management of Research Activities at the University of the United Kingdom]. Universitet i liderstvo, № 5, 13-25. Otrimano z (in Ukrainian).

Drach, I. (2018b). Upravlinnya doslidnickoyu diyalnistyu v sistemi doslidnickogo vryaduvannya: harakteristika ta zakonomirnosti [Management of Research Activities in the System of Research Governance: Characteristics and Regularities]. Visha osvita v Ukrayini, №3, 60–65 (in Ukrainian).

Drach, I. (2018c). Filosofskyi analiz praktyky doslidnytskoho vriaduvannia v universytetakh Velykoi Brytanii [Philosophical analysis of the practice of research governance in the universities of the Great Britain]. Universytet i liderstvo, № 6, 45–57 (in Ukrainian).

Etychnyi kodeks uchenoho Ukrainy [Code of Ethics of the Scientist of Ukraine] (2009). Otrimano z (in Ukrainian).

Zakon Ukrainy «Pro vyshchu osvitu» (2014). [Law of Ukraine «On higher education»]. Otrimano z (in Ukrainian).

Zakon Ukrainy «Pro naukovu i naukovo-tekhnichnu diialnist» (2016). [Law of Ukraine «On Science and Scientific and Technology Activities»]. Otrimano z (in Ukrainian).

Zakon Ukrainy «Pro osvitu» (2017). [Law of Ukraine «On education»]. Otrimano z (in Ukrainian).

Kalynovskyi, Yu. (2012). Akademichna chesnist yak chynnyk pravovoho vykhovannia studentskoi molodi [Academic honesty as a factor in legal education of student youth]. Hileia: naukovyi visnyk : zb. nauk. pr. № 63, 477-482. (in Ukrainian).

Rozshyrenyi hlosarii terminiv ta poniat st. 42 «Akademichna dobrochesnist» Zakonu Ukrainy «Pro osvitu» (vid 5 veresnia 2017 r.) [Extended Glossary of Terms and Concepts Art. 42 "Academic Integrity" of the Law of Ukraine «On Education»] (2017). Otrimano z (in Ukrainian).

Sopova, D. Fenomen akademichnoi chesnosti u konteksti yakosti suchasnoi vyshchoi osvity (2017) [Phenomen of Academic Integrity in context of modern Higher Education]. Otrimano z (in Ukrainian).

Stechenko, O., & Sopova, D. (2016). Problema akademichnoi chesnosti v navchalnomu protsesi ta nautsi: dosvid Natsionalnoho medychnoho universytetu imeni O. O. Bohomoltsia [The Problem of Academic Honesty in Educational Process and Science: Experience of the O.O. Bogomolets National Medical University]. Otrimano z CESNOSTI_V_NAVCALNOMU_PROCESI_TA_NAUCI_DOSVID_NACIONALNOGO_MEDICNOGO_UNIVERSITETU_IMENI_O_O_BOGOMOLCA (in Ukrainian).

Iaroshenko, T. (2005). Akademichna nechesnist ta politychna kultura: porivnialnyi dosvid Ukraina – SShA [Academic dishonesty and political culture: a comparative experience of Ukraine and the USA]. Poklykannia universytetu: zb. nauk. pr., 304 s (in Ukrainian).

Busch P., & Bilgin A. (2014). Student and Staff Understanding and Reaction: Academic Integrity in an Australian University. Retrieved from

University of Cambridge University (2018). Annual Integrity Report to Council 2017-2018. Retrieved from

Code of Practice for Research (2009). Retrieved from

DiVall, M., & Schlesselman, L. (2016). Academic Dishonesty: Whose Fault is it Anyway? Retrieved from

Gallant T. Twenty Years of Academic Integrity: Top Articles & Book Chapters 1992-2012 (2012). Retrieved from

Imperial College London. Research integrity annual report 2017-18 (2018). Retrieved from

McHaney, R., Cronan, T., & Douglas, D. (2016). Academic Integrity: Information Systems Education Perspective. Retrieved from

Meriste, H., Parder, M.-L., Lõuk, K., Simm, K., Lilles-Heinsar, L., Veski, … Sutrop, M. (2016). Promoting Integrity as an Integral Dimension of Excellence in Research. Retrieved from

Procedure for the investigation of misconduct in research (2008). Retrieved from

Self-Assessment Tool for The Concordat to Support Research Integrity (2014). Retrieved from

Shaw D., & Satalkar, P. (2018). Researchers’ interpretations of research integrity: A qualitative study. Retrieved from /08989621.2017.1413940.

The concordat to support research integrity a progress report (2016). Retrieved from

The concordat to support research integrity (2012). Retrieved from

UK Research Integrity Office (20016). Retrieved from

University of Oxford. Annual Research Integrity Statement – 2018 (2018). Retrieved from

Abstract views: 178
PDF Downloads: 155
How to Cite
Drach, I. (2019). Research integrity support in the system of university governance: experience of the UK. International Scientific Journal of Universities and Leadership, (1(7), 26-50.
Leading experience in university management