From accreditation to ranking (functioning vs development)
The essence, strengths and weaknesses of the accreditation and ranking mechanisms for assessing the institutional capacity and performance of higher education institutions are analyzed and systematically compared in the article. Significant advantages of the ranking over accreditation are proved, as well as the subordination of the second one to the first one, given the leading role of higher education in ensuring and accelerating human progress that has a research-innovative and competitive character. The necessity of urgent introduction, as well as the main stages of practical implementation of the national general and sectoral ranking based on the methodology of the Shanghai ranking (ARWU), are substantiated. It is proposed to use a national ranking for modernization of the national network of higher education institutions.
It is argued that accreditation and ranking are fundamentally different mechanisms for assessing education quality with significantly greater possibilities for ranking. Accreditation focuses on the thresholds (minimum) standards and requirements (conditions) and is not suitable for an objective comparative assessment of institutions (educational programmes), taking into account their level of excellence. The rank implies the ranking institutions in the order of their achievements, therefore, in terms of importance and significance, and can be used for relief modeling the landscape of the network of higher education institutions (not only in terms of their territorial or sectoral accumulation, but also in terms of competitiveness). Given this Ukraine with 289 successfully accredited institutions remains a white spot in Europe and the world according to interpretation of the Shanghai ranking of 2018. Unlike accreditation, which, due to limited capabilities, is unable to separate a mass low-order higher education from an innovative high-order higher education, the ranking mechanism reveals the first one as well as the second one.
It was clarified that in contrast to providing motivation of obligation (performance) for developing culture of the minimum sufficient quality by accreditation, the ranking forms motivation of encouragement (creativity) for developing culture of the maximum possible quality. The culture of the maximum possible quality under the current conditions of the research and innovation type of progress and competition is a priority because it enhancing competitiveness. In addition, ranking implies the existence of a developed autonomy, able to respond promptly and effectively to the results of the ranking assessment. Autonomy, basically, is non-critical for accreditation. The results of the ranking can be successfully used for accreditation under the conditions of real autonomy, but the conclusions of accreditation for the ranking of institutions – no. Accreditation is inherently affected by a subjective factor, at the same time, ranking (for example, ARWU) can be constructed with the exclusion of a subjective component, with transferring ranking functions to independent artificial intelligence in the future.
It has been shown that the research and innovation essence of higher education needs an appropriate valid mechanism of assessment of higher education institutions excellence, which is capable of permanently (for example, annually) to record level of institutions development in view of the ability to predict and project the future of society. Therefore, the trend of the rapid development and spread of international and national rankings is actual.
It is argued that the creation of the national ranking of higher education institutions is an urgent objective and should be carried out in several stages: its legislative regulation, the determination of the system of objective indicators agreed by the leading Ukrainian universities (it is advisable to unite them into the leading Association of Ukrainian Universities), organizational and legal, financial support for administration of the ranking (e.g. the National Higher Education Quality Assurance Agency), the annual ranking of institutions and according to its results elaboration and implementation of measures to improve the network of higher education institutions in Ukraine, primarily to consolidate and integrate them.
Avshenyuk, N., Kremen, V., Lugovij, V., Slyusarenko, O., Talanova, Zh. ta in., 2016 (2016). Nacionalna dopovid pro stan i perspektivi rozvitku osviti v [National Report on the State and Prospects of Education in Ukraine]. Ukrayina, Kiyiv: Pedagogichna dumka. (In Ukrainian).
Visha osvita v Ukrayini. 2017 rik: Statistichnij zbirnik. Derzhstat Ukrayini [Higher education in Ukraine. 2017: Statistical Collection. Gosstat of Ukraine]. Retrieved from http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/. (In Ukrainian).
Zakon Ukrayini «Pro vishu osvitu» [Law of Ukraine on higher education] (2014). № 1556-VII. Retrieved from http://zakon5.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1556-18. (In Ukrainian).
Zakon Ukrayini «Pro licenzuvannya vidiv gospodarskoyi diyalnosti» [Law of Ukraine «On Licensing of Types of Economic Activities»] (2015). № 222-VIII. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/222-19. (In Ukrainian).
Zakon Ukrayini «Pro naukovu i naukovo-tehnichnu diyalnist» [Law of Ukraine «On Science and Scientific and Technology Activities»] (2016). № 848-VIII. Retrieved from http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/848-19. (In Ukrainian).
Zakon Ukrayini «Pro osvitu» [Law of Ukraine «On Education»] (2017). № 2145-VIII. Retrieved from http://zakon5.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2145-19. (In Ukrainian).
Zvit rektora Kiyivskogo nacionalnogo universitetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka za 2018 rik Guberskogo Leonida Vasilovicha [Report of the rector of Kyiv National Taras Shevchenko University in 2018, Gubersky Leonid Vasilyevich] (2018). Dopovid na konferenciyi trudovogo kolektivu Kiyivskogo nacionalnogo universitetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. Retrieved from http://www.univ.kiev.ua/pdfs/zvit/zvit-rektora-2018.pdf. (In Ukrainian).
Informacijna sistema «Konkurs». Vstupna kampaniya 2018 roku. [Information system "Competition". Campaign 2018]. Retrieved from http://vstup.info/. (In Ukrainian).
Lugovij, V. I, Slyusarenko, O.M. & Talanova, Zh. V. (2011). Vikoristannya mizhnarodnih rejtingiv vishih navchalnih zakladiv dlya identifikaciyi najvishogo universitetskogo potencialu [Use of international ratings of higher education institutions to identify the highest university potential]. Visha osvita Ukrayini, 3 (dodatok 2), tom I (26). Tematichnij vipusk «Visha osvita Ukrayini u konteksti integraciyi do yevropejskogo osvitnogo prostoru», 296-308. (In Ukrainian).
Lugovij, V. I, Slyusarenko, O.M. & Talanova, Zh. V. (2017a). Politika prioritezaciyi, zabezpechennya i pokrashennya yakosti yak osnovi gumanizaciyi vishoyi osviti [Policy of prioritization, assurance and improvement of quality as the basis of humanization of higher education]. Lugovij V., Talanova Zh. (red..). Svitoglyadni prioriteti gumanizaciyi vishoyi osviti: monografiya (5-131). Kiyiv: Institut vishoyi osviti NAPN Ukrayini. Retrieved from http://ihed.org.ua/images/biblioteka/mon_Svitogl_prior_gum_vish_Osv_IVO-2017-229p_ avtors-kolektiv.pdf. (In Ukrainian).
Lugovij, V., Sauh, Р., Kalashnikova, S., Slyusarenko, O. & Talanova, Zh. (2018, berezen-kviten). Na chasi rozroblennya nacionalnogo rejtingu zakladiv vishoyi osviti [At the time of development of the national rating of institutions of higher education]. Pedagogichna gazeta. s. 4. (In Ukrainian).
Lugovij, V., Slyusarenko, O. & Talanova, Zh. (2017b). Uroki liderstva dlya Ukrayini vid Shanhajskogo rejtingu 2017 roku [Leadership lessons for Ukraine from the 2017 Shanghai ranking]. International Scientific Journal of Universities and Leadership, 2(5), 1-19. Retrieved from http://elite-journal.org/en/potochniy-nomer/. (In Ukrainian).
Lugovij, V., Slyusarenko, O. & Talanova, Zh. (2018a). Novi uroki liderstva dlya Ukrayini vid Shanhajskogo rejtingu 2018 roku [New leadership lessons for Ukraine from the 2018 Shanghai ranking]. Pedagogika i psihologiya, 3, 5-22. (In Ukrainian).
Lugovij, V., Slyusarenko, O. & Talanova, Zh. (2018b). Svitovij dosvid dlya stvorennya nacionalnogo rejtingu zakladiv vishoyi osviti [World experience for creating a national ranking of institutions of higher education]. Pedagogika i psihologiya. Visnik NAPN Ukrayini, 2, 5-23. (In Ukrainian).
Pro zatverdzhennya Licenzijnih umov provadzhennya osvitnoyi diyalnosti [On approval of Licensing conditions for conducting educational activities]. Postanova Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrayini vid 30 grud. 2015 r. № 1187. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1187-2015-%D0%BF. (In Ukrainian).
Pro zatverdzhennya pereliku galuzej znan i specialnostej, za yakimi zdijsnyuyetsya pidgotovka zdobuvachiv vishoyi osviti [About the approval of the list of branches of knowledge and specialties, which provide training for higher education graduates]. Postanova Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrayini vid 29 kvit. 2015 r. № 266. Retrieved from http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/266-2015-%D0%BF. (In Ukrainian).
Pro zatverdzhennya pereliku svitovih rejtingiv universitetiv dlya viznachennya osoblivoyi kategoriyi inozemciv ta osib bez gromadyanstva, yaki pretenduyut na pracevlashtuvannya v Ukrayini [On approval of the list of world rankings of universities for determining the special category of foreigners and stateless persons who apply for employment in Ukraine]. Rozporyadzhennya Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrayini vid 14 bereznya 2018 r. № 154-r. Retrieved from http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/154-2018-%D1%80. (In Ukrainian).
Salmi, Dzh. (2009). Sozdanie universitetov mirovogo klassa [Creating world-class universities]. Moskva: Izd-vo «Ves mir». (In Rashion).
Slyusarenko, O. (2015). Rozvitok najvishogo universitetskogo potencialu v umovah globalizaciyi: monografiya [Development of the highest university potential in the conditions of globalization: monograph]. Kiyiv: Prioriteti. (In Ukrainian).
Talanova, Zh. (2010). Doktorska pidgotovka u sviti ta Ukrayini: monografiya [Doctoral training in the world and Ukraine: monograph]. Kiyiv.: Milenium. (In Ukrainian).
ETH Zurich. Retrieved from https://www.ethz.ch/en.html.
Higher Education to 2030 (2009), Volume 2: Globalisation. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/edu/ceri/highereducationto2030volume2globalisation.htm.
Human Development Indices and Indicators: 2018 Statistical Update (2018). Retrieved from https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/2018_human_development_statistical_update.pdf.
International Standard Classification of Education. ISCED 2011 (2012). UNESCO. Retrieved from http://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/ international-standard-classification-of-education-isced-2011-en.pdf.
Lugovyi, V., Orzhel, O., Slyusarenko, O. & Talanova, Zh. (2018). Education and research duality – the determining characteristic of higher education. Education: Modern Discourses, 1, 71-88. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.32405/2617-3107-2018-1-8.
QS World University Rankings (2018). Retrieved from https://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings/world-university-rankings/2019.
ShanghaiRanking’s Academic Ranking of World Universities 2018 Press Release (2018). Retrieved from http://www.shanghairanking.com/Academic-Ranking-of-World-Universities-2018-Press-Release.html.
ShanghaiRanking’s Global Ranking of Academic Subjects 2018 Press Release (2018). Retrieved from http://www.shanghairanking.com/ShanghaiRankings-Global-Ranking-of-Academic-Subjects-2018-Press-Release.html.
THE World University Rankings. Retrieved from www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/.
Abstract views: 247 PDF Downloads: 251
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.