THE PROMINENCE OF THE NAPOLEONIC MODEL OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY

  • Pascal Doh University of Tampere, Finland
  • Theresia Bilola University of Turku, Finland
Keywords: Professionalization, model, university, employment, application, France, Cameroon

Abstract

Drawn on a historical analysis of the main pillars of modern higher education systems which are globally diffused and transcend international boundaries (Clark 1983; Ben-David 1977; Fox and Weisz 1980), professional higher education, thus higher education for employment and direct application is identified as a French historical model of thinking the role of higher education which was remarkably fostered from the era of Napoleon. In this article we examine how the professional model of thinking the role of higher education addresses and incorporates other models which perceived the roles of higher education in the modern society similarly or differently. The analyses led to the identification of ten models with related roles on the basis of which a questionnaire composed of thirty two questions was administered to teachers and students of higher education management. The first observation that results from the desktop review on the history of the French model of higher education is a dominant transition from structural to programmatic professionalization, whereby professionalization which was a function of specialised establishments is becoming the function and mission of all academic programmes. This pattern is discernible in France itself or within the French model overseas, the case herein of Cameroon. A main result of the study is that although professionalization remains prominent and indeed a priority, it only covers about half of the roles of higher education some of which could address some of the objectives aimed at in professionalization policies and strategies. We also conclude that recent changes in the higher education landscape have brought into lime light, alternative models which call on a change in perspectives about the role of higher education and changes in professionalization strategies. This is the case of the knowledge and learning economy models which may suggest the importance of professionalization tackling employability capacities through learning, problem solving and other survival approaches rather being limited to employment and direct application.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arrow, K. (1973) “Higher Education as a filter“ I Journal of Public Economics (2), Elsevier Science Publishers B.V, pp. 193-216.
Becker, G. (1994). Human Capital: A theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with special reference to Education (3rd Edition.). New York: Columbia University Press.
Ben-David, J. (1977). Centers of Learning: Britain, France, Germany, United States. An Essay prepared for the Carnegie Foundation on Higher Education. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Canton, E., & Venniker, R. (2001). Economics of Higher Education. Higher Education Reform: Getting the Incentives Right, (35–51). Enschede: CHEPS.
Castells, M. (2001). Universities as dynamic systems of contradictory functions. In Johan Muller, Nico Cloete & Shiren Badat (eds.). Challenges of Globalisation. South African Debates with Manuel Castells. Cape Town: Maskew Miller Longman, 206-224.
Clark, B.R. (1983). The Higher Education System: Academic Organization in Cross-National Perspectives, Berkeley, University of California Press.
Cloete, N., and Maassen, P. (2002) “Global reform trends in higher Education”. In Transformation in higher education, global pressures and local realities in South Africa, edited by Cloete Nico. 7-33. Available online at www.chet.org.za
Doh, P.S. & Engola, S.A. (2016). “How Professional are the emerging Professional Master Programmes in the Bologna Degree Architecture. Horrizon, International Association of Univertsities. Paris.
Doh, P.S. (2015). “Conclusion: Capacity Development is the Way: Sustainable Impact of Higher Education Development Policy in the South. In (Ed.). Holtta, S, Moore, A and Pekkola, E. Higher Education Institutions Partnering for Development and Change, Reflections of the First Round of the Finnish HEI ICI Programme. CIMO & University of Tampere.
Doh, P.S. (2012). The Responses of the Higher Education Sector in the Poverty Reduction Strategies in Africa: the Case of Cameroon. Doctoral Dissertation, Acta Universitatis Tamperensis 1755, Tampere University Press, Tampere.
Doh, P. S. (2008). Global Integration Policies Versus Institutional Dynamics of Higher Education. In Sarah & Chalier, (ed.), The Implications of Competition for the Future of European Higher Education (vol. 40.78-97). European Education.
Doh, P. S. (2007). Harmonisation Challenges in Higher Education: Case of the French and British Bicultural System in Cameroon. Published M.Phil Thesis, University of Tampere, Finland. Available at: http//tutkielmat.uta.fi & www.uv.uio.no/hedda/masterprogramme/published_thesis.html.
Engell, J., and Dangerfield, A. (1998). The market-model university: Humanities in the age of money. Harvard Magazine 3 (May-June): 48-55.
Etzkowitz, H., and Leydesdorff, L. (eds.). (1997). Universities in the Global Economy: A Triple Helix of University –Industry-Government Relations. London: Cassell Academic.
Fox, R., and Weisz, G. (1980). Introduction: The institutional basis of French science in the nineteenth century. In R. Fox, & George, Weiz (eds), The organization of science and technology in France 1808-1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1-28.
Geiger, Roger L. (1985). “Ch.3: The Home of Scientists: A Perspective on University Research”in (Ed) Wittrock, Bjorn Wittrock, B.; Elzinga, Aant and Elzinga, A. The University Research System. The Public Policies of the home of Scientists, pp.53-73.
Gumport, P. (2000). Academic Restructuring: Organizational Change and Institutional Imperatives. Higher Education, 39, 67–91.
Hillage, J., and Pollard, E. (1998). Employability: developing a framework for policy analysis. Research Brief 85, Department for Education and Employment.
Holtta, S., Moore, A. and Pekkola, E. (2015). Higher Education Institutions Partnering for Development and Change, Reflections of the First Round of the Finnish HEI ICI Programme. CIMO & University of Tampere.
Kerr, Clark (1963) “The Uses of the University”. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 5th ed. 2001).
Kirp, D. (2003). Shakespeare, Einstein, and the bottom line: The marketing of higher education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Knight, P., and Yorke, M. (2000). Skills plus: Tuning the Undergraduate Curriculum. Skills Plus Project Report.
Leroux, J-Yves. (2014). The professionalization of degree courses in France: New issues in an old debate, Higher Education Management and Policy, 24(3): 87-105.
Lundvall, B. A., & Soete, L. (2002). Innovations and Competence building systems. Alborg, Denmark: Department of Business Studies, University of Aalborg.
Lundvall, B. A. (ed.). (1992). National Systems of Innovation - Toward a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter Publishers.
Marshall, C., & G. B. Rossman (1999). Designing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications.
Marginson, S., and Considine, M. (2000). The enterprise university: power, governance, and reinvention. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Neave, G., (2002). The stakeholder perspective historically explored. In Enders, J., and Fulton, O. (eds.). Higher education in a globalising world. International trends and mutual observation. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1-14.
Njeuma, D. et al. (1999). Reforming a national system of higher education: the case of Cameroon. Washington: ADEA-WGHE. Retrieved online from http://www.adeanet.org/pubadea/publications/pdf/he_cameroon_en.pdf
QAA (2010) “ Master's degree characteristics”, Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education, United Kingdom. Available at available on our website www.qaa.ac.uk
Rothblatt, S. (1993). “Ch.1: The Limbs of the Osiris: liberal education in the English-speaking world”in (Ed) Rothblatt, Sheldon and Wittrock, Bjorn. The European and American University Since 1800. Historical and Sociological Essays, pp. 19-73.
Shils, E. & Roberts, J. (2004). The Diffusion of European Models outside Europe. In Ruegg, Walter (ed.), A History of the University in Europe. (III, 163- 230). Cambridge University Press.
Turner, S. R. (2001). “Humboldt in North America? Reflections on the Research University and Its Historians”, in (Ed). Staub, Nicole and Jost, Kathrin. Humboldt international. Der Export de deutschen Universitatsmodells im 19 und Jahrhundert, pp. 289-312.
Weiss, A. (1995). Human Capital vs Signalling Explanation of Wages. I Journal of Economic perspectives. A journal of American Economic Association, 9 (4), 133-155.
Yorke, M. (2001). “Employability in the first cycle higher education “. A working paper for the ‘Skills Plus’ Project. Liverpool, John Moores University.

Abstract views: 37
PDF Downloads: 46
Published
2016-12-26
How to Cite
Doh, P., & Bilola, T. (2016). THE PROMINENCE OF THE NAPOLEONIC MODEL OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY. International Scientific Journal of Universities and Leadership, (3). Retrieved from https://ul-journal.org/index.php/journal/article/view/33
Section
THE DEVELOPMENT OF LEADERSHIP POTENTIAL OF UNIVERSITIES