Neoliberal Algorithm of Higher Economic Education as the Instrument for Deformation of Strategic Thinking

Keywords: higher economic education, neoliberal ideology, strategic thinking, social management


Neoliberal paradigm of higher education, which is dominating in today’s global world, orients everyone who studies economic science for compliance with standards of self-regulating free market and recognition of its key role in social economy. Such educational algorithm, in our opinion, significantly narrows the range for comprehension of strategic solutions in specific historical economic problems. In particular, limiting the horizons of professional economists and focusing their attention on the capabilities of only one economic ideology significantly restricts freedom of thought and freedom of choice for strategies of economic behavior. Also we should say that mixed types of economic evolution in developed countries are not practically determined by the theoretical postulates defended by neoliberalism. Thus, critical analyses and significant transformation of implemented in the 1990’s ideological platform are long ago actualized not only in theory, but mainly in the level of socio-economic practices. In our opinion, modern Ukraine needs a fundamentally new approach for organization of educational process in the field of higher economic education. And the main focus of transformation in educational sphere should be namely strategic vectors of comprehension for the future of the country. That is, we must clearly define which kind of professional economists we are educating and for what purpose: should they create and implement effective strategies of socio-economic development or just to reproduce borrowed economic scenarios, formed by external global actors? Our answer to this question requires providing of an academic condition for creating self-sufficient professionals who will be able to take responsibility for development and implementation of productive socio-economic strategies.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Tetiana Hlushko , National Pedagogical Dragomanov University

Doctor of Sciences (Philosophical), Docent, Professor at the Chair of Philosophy


Avraamov, P.A. (2017) Stratehyia Ho y sovremennyi byznes yly Kak pobedyt v konkurentnoi borbe [Go Strategy and Modern Business or How to Win the Competition]. Moskva: Yzdatelstvo «Olymp-Byznes». 420 s. (Іn Russian).

Banerdzhi A., Duflo E. (2018) Ekonomika bidnosti. Yak zvilnyty svit vid zlydniv [Poverty economy. How to free the world from poverty]. Kyiv: Nash Format. 312 s. (in Ukrainian).

Voeikov M.Y. (1999) Эkonomycheskyi determynyzm K. Marksa y russkye ynterprytyatsyy. Karl Marks y sovremennaia fylosofyia [Economic determinism of K. Marx and Russian interpretations. Karl Marx and modern philosophy]. Sb. materyalov nauch. konf. k 180-letyiu so dnia rozhdenyia Marksa. Moskva: Ynstytut fylosofyy RAN, S. 329-343. (Іn Russian).

Hlushko, T.P. (2015) Filosofsko-ekonomichnyi zmist i sotsialna produktyvnist neoliberalizmu [Philosophical and economic content and social productivity of neoliberalism]. Filosofski obrii. Poltava: DPU im. V.H. Korolenka. Vypusk 34. C. 24-34. (in Ukrainian).

Rainert, E. (2019) Yak bahati krainy staly bahatymy… I chomu bidni krainy zalyshaiutsia bidnymy [How rich countries became rich… And why poor countries remain poor]. Kyiv: Samit-Knyha. 416 s. (in Ukrainian).

Rei, R. (2018) «Ia zh vam kazav!». Suchasna ekonomika za Haimanom Minsky ["I told you!" Modern economy according to Gaiman of Minsk]. Kyiv: Nash Format. 288 s. (in Ukrainian).

Friland, Kh. (2017) Plutokraty. Epokha novykh bahatykh i zanepad staroi systemy [Plutocrats. The era of the new rich and the decline of the old system]. Kyiv: Nash Format. 328 s. (in Ukrainian).

Chanh, Kha-Dzhun (2018) Zlye samarytiane: myf o svobodnoi torhovle y sekretnaia ystoryia kapytalyzma [The Evil Samaritans: The Myth of Free Trade and the Secret History of Capitalism]. Moskva: Mann, Yvanov y Ferber. 256 s. (Іn Russian).

International Student Initiative for Pluralism in Economics (2015-2016).

ISIPE, One year later. 5 May 2015 Joint Statement (2015).

Galbács, P. (2020) The End of Economics?

Abstract views: 104
PDF Downloads: 102
How to Cite
Hlushko , T. (2020). Neoliberal Algorithm of Higher Economic Education as the Instrument for Deformation of Strategic Thinking. International Scientific Journal of Universities and Leadership, (10), 26-34.
Higher education reform: philosophical and theoretical aspects